IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.235 IOIN-FAO-3552-2013 AND FAO-3552-2013 Date of Decision:04.02.2025 ...Appellant Versus .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. V Ramswaroop, Advocate for Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2- Insurance Company. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Perusal of the paperbook reveals that none had made appearance on behalf of the appellant from the last four consecutive dates. Even, in the order dated 01.10.2024, it has been observed that correct address of respondent No.1 was not furnished. Seemingly, the appellant is not interested to pursue the present appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the IOIN also stands disposed of. (ARCHANA PURI) 04.02.2025 JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anu 2025.02.05 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document