Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87697 (MAD)

G.RAJKUMAR v. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

CRL MP/16277/2025 · 2025-08-29

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.08.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 G.Rajkumar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep By The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.13/2008 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Mahila Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruvannamalai, in S.C.No.124 of 2009 dated 30.04.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Mahila Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruvannamalai, in S.C.No.124 of 2009 dated 30.04.2025, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal. 2. The petitioner, who is an accused in S.C.No.124 of 2009, was convicted and sentenced by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Mahila Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruvannamalai, vide judgment dated 30.04.2025, as follows: Rank of the accused Conviction under Section Sentence awarded A1 Section 341 of IPC to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. Section 376 of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 4. This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since the Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner had committed very serious and heinous offence as against the victim girl who is aged about 14 years old at the time of occurrence. 5. In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. 29.08.2025 (2/2) Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Mahila Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. sma Crl.M.P.No.16277 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1353 of 2025 29.08.2025 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis