Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87691 (KAR)

SRI.R.K. SRINIVAS SHASTRY v. THE SECRETARY

WP/18193/2023 · 2025-12-11

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52625 WP No. 18193 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18193 OF 2023 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SRI.R.K. SRINIVAS SHASTRY, S/O K RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, PRIEST, SOMESHWARASWAMY TEMPLE, DIMABALA VILLAGE, RONOOR HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ANANDA K.V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MUJARI BRANCH, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, FOR RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560027. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, FOR RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, ALUR VENKATARAO ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560018. Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52625 WP No. 18193 of 2023 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101. 5. THE THASILDAR, SRINIVASPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TO FIX TASTIK ALLOWANCE OF RS. 39,000/- PER ACRE CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Sri. Ananda K.V., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to consider the representation dated 27.12.2017 (Annexure-C) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52625 WP No. 18193 of 2023 and another representation dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure-G), by the respondent. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation referred to above, within an outer limit of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17