Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37408 Court No. - 6 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3223 of 2025 Applicant :- Anas Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Saroj,Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ambreen Masroor,G.A.,Sadrul Islam Jafri Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard Shri Abhishek Kumar Saroj and Nagendra Bahadur Singh, learned counsels for the applicant; Shri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri S.I. Jafri, learned counsel and Shri Upendra Pal Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This is third bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on 21.12.2022 and, thereafter, second bail application of applicant was rejected on
30.09.2024. 3. The applicant has challenged the aforesaid orders before the Supreme Cour by way of filing Special leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.14046 of 2024 (Anas v. State of U.P.). However, the same was dismissed by an order dated 18.10.2024 and for reference, the order is reproduced hereinafter:-
"1. Heard Mr. Abdul Quadir Abbasi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. Having considered the nature of the criminal antecendents, we are disinclined to consider bail for the petitioner. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. 3. The presence of Mr. Rajul Bhargava, learned Senior Counsel, who represents the informant is noted for the purpose of record. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed."
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a bail application of similarly situated co-accused was earlier granted by this Court on 30.4.2024 and S.L.P. against it is pending at the behest of complainant. 5. Per contra, Shri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri S.I. Jafri, learned counsel and Shri Upendra Pal Singh, learned AGA for the State have opposed the bail. 6. As referred above, order dated 03.09.2024 whereby the second bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court was challenged before the Supreme Court and the S.L.P. was rejected on the ground taking note the criminal antecedents of the applicant. 7. This bail application is filed on 10.01.2025, i.e., within just less than three months of the aforesaid order passed by the Supreme Court. No subsequent event is brought on record which warrant consideration by this Court. 8. According to the status report, out of the 17 witnesses, the statement of PW-1 is still under way. 9.
In the aforesaid circumstances, Court does not find any subsequent event after the order dated 18.10.2024 was passed by the Supreme Court. 10. Accordingly, the present bail application is rejected. Order Date :- 17.3.2025/ A.N. Mishra Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad