[2025:RJ-JP:6661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3947/2001 Hanuman Prasad (Deceased) S/o Shri Mahadev S/o Pachar Tehsil Dataramgarh Distt. Sikar (raj 1/1 Gayatri Devi W/o Hanuman Prasad 1/2 Mahesh Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad 1/3 Vinod Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad 1/4 Sunil Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad 1/5 Suman Devi S/o Hanuman Prasad 1/6 Mamta Devi D/o Hanuman Prasad 1/7 Sunita Devi D/o Hanuman Prasad 1/8 Kavita Devi D/o Hanuman Prasad All are R/o Pachar Tehsil Dataramgarh Distt. SIkar (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the Collector Sikar 2. Gram Panchayat Pachar Tehsil Danta Ramgarh District Sikar through Its Sarpanch 3. Board of Revenue for Rajasthan at Ajmer through its Registrar 4. Revenue Appellate Authority Sikar 5. Sub Divisional Officer Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. P.C. Jain with Mr. Roshan Vishwakarma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC with Ms. Gunjan Chawla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 14/02/2025 On 12.02.2025, following order was passed:- "Pursuant to direction of this Court dated 13.11.2024, the respondents have filed an additional affidavit of Shri Mahipal Singh- Tehsildar, Dantaramgarh dated 02.12.2024 [2025:RJ-JP:6661] (2 of 2) [CW-3947/2001] stating therein that entire area of old khasra no.65 was 39 bigha 7 biswa is still recorded in the khatedari of the sons of the original khatedar Shri Hanuman Prasad and there is no reduction in its area. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted time to complete his instructions. List the matter on 14.02.2025 at top of the list as prayed." Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of additional affidavit dated 02.12.2024 furnished by Shri Mahipal Singh-Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. He, however, submits that they should not be divested of their property in the garb of judgement of Board of Revenue dated 16.10.2000 and 21.12.2000 passed in reference. Learned State Counsel submits that possession of the petitioners over the subject land, as mentioned in the additional affidavit of the Tehsildar Dantaramgarh dated 02.12.2024, would not be interferred with. Resultantly, this writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/257