IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 RSA-4602-2016 (O & M) Date of Decision:22.04.2025 KARAMJIT SINGH ...APPELLANT VERSUS JIT SINGH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. As per office report, sole respondent has expired. Despite grant of repeated opportunities, his legal representatives have not been brought on the record. 2. Appellant is unrepresented. Similar has been the position on numerous occasions. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 3. Dismissed for default in prosecution. 4. Pending applications are disposed off. 22.04.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.04.25 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh