Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87623 (ALL)

POONAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/28166/2025 · 2025-08-20

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143736 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28166 of 2025 Petitioner :- Poonam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the learned respondent no.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid appeal filed under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 dated 21-9-2024 before respondent no.2 bearing appeal no.C-202414000002674 of 2024 (Madhuri versus Poonam and others) District Jaunpur within stipulated period." 2. It is contended that an appeal under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 [Computerized Case No. C- 202414000002674] is pending consideration before the respondent No. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to expedite the aforesaid case. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide the appeal filed under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 [Computerized Case No. C-202414000002674], in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad