Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87622 (ALL)

KARANVEER SINGH v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

A482/27217/2024 · 2025-07-17

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117065 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27217 of 2024 Applicant :- Karanveer Singh Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Verma,Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shive Datta Yadav Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos. 2 & 3; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer to quash the order dated 16.01.2024 passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar in Misc. Case No. 1812 of 2023 (Karan Veer Singh Vs. Biresh Yadav and others), under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., Police Station- Chakeri, District-Kanpur Nagar as well as the order dated 06.06.2024 passed by Additional District & Session Judge Court No.19, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Revision No.42 of 2024 (Karanveer Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others). 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that applicant has challenged the order dated 16.01.024 by which applicant's application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. has been rejected by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, thereafter, applicant challenged the order dated 16.01.2024 by filing Criminal Revision No. 42 of 2024, the learned Revisional Court vide order dated 06.06.2024 rejected the revision of the applicant-revisionist. Counsel for the applicant submit that the order dated 16.01.2024 passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar as well as the order dated 06.06.2024 passed by Additional District & Session Judge Court No.19, Kanpur Nagar/ Revisional Court, are without application of judicial mind and liable to be quashed. Further, on perusal of evidence available as well as the content of application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., prima facie, criminal offence is made out. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 & 3 vehemently opposed the submission raised by applicant's counsel and submitted that on perusal of contents of application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., no criminal offence is made out. Moreover, applicant has remedy to file complaint. 5. Considered the submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. From the record, it is evident that the order dated 16.01.2024 passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar as well as the order dated 06.06.2024 passed by Additional District & Session Judge Court No.19, Kanpur Nagar/ Revisional Court, are just and proper and do not contain any illegality. As such, no interference is warranted by this Court. In view of judgement passed by full Bench in the case of Father Thomas Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2010 SCC Online All 2438, the present application is not maintainable. 6. The present 482 application is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad