M/S CHARTERED HOUSING PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/22092/2022 · 2025-10-29
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87616 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87616 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43061 WP No. 22092 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.22092 OF 2022 (GM-ST/RN) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S CHARTERED HOUSING PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.27, VICTORIA ROAD, BENGALURU -560047 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. A. BALAKRISHNA HEGDE, S/O LATE DR. CHANDAIAH HEGDE
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU -560001.
2.
THE SENIOR SUB REGISTRAR DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43061 WP No. 22092 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 15.09.2022 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT SENIOR SUB REGISTRAR, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE A, IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY NO 28/1 MEASURING 30 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.28/5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS TOTALLY MEASURING 1 ACRE 11 GUNTAS SITUATED AT CHIKKOBANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
This petition is listed for 9th time for non- compliance of the office objections.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43061 WP No. 22092 of 2022
Despite having been granted sufficient time, the
learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7