Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87611 (KAR)

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR v. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD

CRP/229/2020 · 2025-10-31

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44022 CRP No. 229 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 229 OF 2020 (IO) BETWEEN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. ASHED VALMARK (M/S ASHED PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED) REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SAMEER A. KHAN NO.154/1, SAMEER HOUSE WHEELER ROAD, FRASER TOWN BENGALURU - 560 005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS L, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, RECOVERIES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. MANOJ J. SHAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HDFC HOUSE, NO.51 KASTURBA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. ALOK DHANDA S/O SRI. DHARAM VIR DHANDA NO.3, GROVE PARK SQUARE, GOSFORTH, NEW CASTLE UPON TYNE, NE3 1BN LONDON, ENGLAND. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44022 CRP No. 229 of 2020 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC. 115 R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S. 2326/2017 ON THE FILES OF THE LEARNED LXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo. The memo reads as under: "Counsel for petitioner humbly submits that the present revision petition has been filed challenging order dated 27.11.2019 passed by learned LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge Bengaluru in OS 2326 OF 2017 dismissing interlocutory application filed by petitioner – 2nd defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC for deletion of 2nd defendant as party to the suit. Based on application filed by the plaintiff for withdrawal of suit, by virtue of order dated 17.12.2024 passed by Hon’ble Trial Court in OS.2326 of 2017, the Hon’ble Trial Court has returned the plaint with liberty to plaintiff to file the same before Court having jurisdiction, with the result that suit has been disposed off. Consequently the present revision petition doesn’t survive for consideration. Screenshot of order dated 17.12.2024 is produced herewith and marked as Annexure A. Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that the memo may be taken on record and this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the present revision as infructuous.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44022 CRP No. 229 of 2020 Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59 CT: BHK