Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87584 (ALL)

GANGAJALI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 21 OTHERS

WRIB/3346/2025 · 2025-09-21

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3346 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. The petitioner has aggrieved by the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District-Ghazipur. Shri Ashish Nishad, learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner has appealed the impugned order before the appellate authority under the Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner cannot avail two remedies simultaneously. Faced with this, Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the prayer sought in the writ petition. The prayer sought in the writ petition is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner recasts the relief and submits that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the appellate court for interim relief. It is always open to the petitioner to avail his remedies as per law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 22, 2025 Ashish Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Gangajali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 21 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad