Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
113
CRM-M-42200-2025
Date of Decision : 05.08.2025
NARINDER KAUR
…. PETITIONER V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …. RESPONDENTS
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : Mr.Balraj Gujjar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he moved an application to the SP Ambala but no action has been taken on this application. Aggrieved from the same, he moved another application to SP, Ambala dated 28.07.2025 but despite clinching evidence i.e. CCTV footage, photographs and the accused having committed cognizable offence but no action on the same has also been taken so far and requested that respondent No.3 be directed to take action as per law.
2.
Heard.
3.
The request is allowed.
4.
Accordingly the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take action on the applications submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE
05.08. 2025 anju
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.08.06 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh