Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8757 (JHR)

VIKASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./726/2025 · 2025-04-04

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:10486) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.726 of 2025 ------ Vikash Kumar, aged about 32 years, S/o Ashok Kumar, R/o Village- 270 Bokaro Thermal, P.O.- Govindpur, P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-04-04-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 25.02.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 25.02.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner was directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within one week, but due to mistake on the part of the Advocate’s Clerk, the said defects was not removed within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 for non-compliance of the order dated 25.02.2025. It is next submitted that non- compliance of the order dated 25.02.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list A.B.A. (Filing) No.784 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/