Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010048142025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1623/2025 JENITA PARBIN BARBHUYA @ LASKAR D/O- LATE ABDUL JALIL LASKAR, R/O- VILL.- LOKNATHPUR, PARGANA- DAVIDSONABAD, P.S.- DHOLAI, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788114. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR- 788001 DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF LAND ACQUISITION SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM- 788001. 4:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ROOM NO. 509 Page No.# 2/3 TRANSPORT BHAWAN -1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI PIN CODE- 110001. 5:GENERAL MANAGER (P) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS GOVT. OF INDIA PESKAR LANE SONAI ROAD KANAKPUR PART-1 SILCHAR ASSAM- 78806 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MS. S. CHANDA,MS. K L R YANTHAN,MS. J GHOSH,MS. U NANDA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05-05-2025 Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1; Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3; and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL for the respondent nos. 4 & 5. Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite information to the petitioner, he has not been supplied with the copies of the unregistered Rental Agreement dated 09.03.2020 & 15.02.2023 in original. In such view of the matter, Mr. Biswas has submitted that he may be permitted to Page No.# 3/3 withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer for withdrawal. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant