Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87557 (PNJ)

GOURAV JAIN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8514/2025 · 2025-08-06

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8514-2025 1 114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8514-2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 GOURAV JAIN ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ….... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Angrej Singh, Advocate for Mr. Shubham, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to official respondent for taking action against the accused who openly threatening the life of the petitioner and his family members. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation was given on 25.07.2025 (Annexure P-7) to official respondents. However, it had failed to yield any response. It has been submitted that the official respondents were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to official respondent to look into the representation dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure P- 7) of the petitioner and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Gaurav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab Asgar Ali 2025.08.07 08:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8514-2025 2 accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. In the wake of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of and official respondents are directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate steps, if any required, under the provisions of law. However, if official respondent does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure P-7), then the petitioner shall be duly informed as per the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in 2013 (4) RCR (Criminal) 979 ‘Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors’. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 06.08.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Asgar Ali 2025.08.07 08:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document