THAKUR JUGAL KISHORE NATH SHAH DEO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/1744/2025 · 2025-07-01
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8753 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8753 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:17336 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 1744 of 2025
------
1. Thakur Jugal Kishore Nath Shah Deo, son of Thakur Jogendra Nath Shah Deo, resident of Village Basargarh, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Tupudana, District Ranchi
2. Kumar Jai Kishore Nath Shahdeo, son of Thakur Jogendra Nath Shah Deo, resident of Village Basargarh, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Tupudana, District Ranchi
3. Nawal Kishore Nath Shahdeo, son of Thakur Jogendra Nath Shah Deo, resident of Village Basargarh, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Tupudana, District Ranchi
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi
2. Jharkhand Urban Development and Housing Department, through its Secretary, at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi
3. Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi through its Municipal Commissioner, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi
4. Town Planner, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi
.... .... .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. R.N. Sahay, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Kirtivardhan, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Sweta Shukla, A.C. to A.A.G. II For the RMC
: Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate
Mr. Karbir, Advocate
.
------
Order No.02 / Dated : 01.07.2025
Instant writ petition has been filed to modify the Master Plan, 2037 on the plea that the land of the petitioners Plot No.552, Khata No.96, Mauja Pugru, Circle Namkum, Thana No.250, has been recorded as a part of pond, whereas it is contended that the said land is residential in nature.
2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the location of his plot as reflected in the map prepared as per the Master Plan, 2037.
3. There is merit in the submission advanced on behalf of the State that drawing of the map, does not affect the legal right of the petitioners by the publication of it.
4. Nevertheless, petitioners are at liberty to move the competent authority for necessary modification in the map by filing representation. On representation being submitted, the same will be disposed of after necessary field inquiry within twelve weeks, after the said submission of the representation by the authority.
Writ Petition stands disposed of. Interlocutory Application, if any, is
disposed of.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit