SAURABH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ALIAS LALA v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/28598/2025 · 2025-09-10
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28598 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 4. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.62 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Kolhui, District- Maharajganj, during the pendency of trial. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of four criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in paragraph 8 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of one case assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.06.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. On the other hand, learned State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saurabh Kumar Srivastava Alias Lala .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Saurabh Kumar Srivastava Alias Lala, involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
September 11, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 28598 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad