SMT. POONAM AGARWAL v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/2393/2025 · 2025-03-02
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30634-DB
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2393 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Agarwal Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Srivastava,Vikas Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated August 20, 2024 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Farukkhabad is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad