SRI. THIPPAIAH v. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
MFA/2148/2025 · 2025-12-13
Lok Adalath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87507 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87507 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
&
SMT. ARCHANA K M., MEMBER
M.F.A.No.2148/2025 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.6369/2025) BETWEEN:
1 . SRI. THIPPAIAH S/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO. 107, RAMA TEMPLE ROAD HULIMAVU, B.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076
2 . T.M ANUJA S/O THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEAR RESIDENT OF NO. 107, RAMA TEMPLE ROAD HULIMAVU, B.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076
3 . PADMA T S/O THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEAR RESIDENT OF NO. 107, RAMA TEMPLE ROAD HULIMAVU, B.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076
2
4 . T.VINUTHA S/O THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEAR RESIDENT OF NO. 107, RAMA TEMPLE ROAD HULIMAVU, B.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076 ...APPELLANTS (By SRI. GIRIMALLAIAH, ADVOCATE))
AND:
1 . ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.186/7, GROUND FLOOR, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS WILSON GARDEN, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE -560 027 BY ITS MANAGER
2 . MR. MARIMUTHU.P S/O PALANIAPPAN MAJOR (AGE OF R-2 NOT KNOWN TO APPELLANTS) D. NO. 5/39, MANAMEDU SOUTH STREET, THANGAYUR POST, EDAPPADY TALU SELEM DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU-637 102 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO. 4974/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3
CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant/s - Claimant/s is present. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/s - claimant/s (being authorized by the appellant/s - claimant/s to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant/s - claimant/s has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3.
The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 4
5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUSTICE
Sd/- MEMBER
PHM