Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87500 (KAR)

SMT. M.K. TEJAWATHY v. SRI. S. RAVIKUMAR VARMA

CRP/420/2016 · 2025-10-31

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43918 CRP No. 420 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.420 OF 2016 (SC) BETWEEN: SMT M.K. TEJAWATHY W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED MAJOR PROPRIETOR OF SRI VINAYAKA PRINTERS NO.6/1, DR TCM ROYAN ROAD COTTON PET, BANGALORE-560 063 …PETITIONER (BY SRI M.N.MADHUSUDHAN AND SRI SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATES -ABSENT) AND: SRI. S. RAVIKUMAR VARMA PROPRIETOR RESOLUTION OLD NO.67, 1ST FLOOR 4TH MAIN, INDUSTRIAL TOWN RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 044 NEW NO.60/2, 2ND MAIN ROAD RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 044 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VIJAYKUMAR PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.06.2016 PASSED IN S.C.No.516/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. JUDGE, AND XXXII ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43918 CRP No. 420 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Case called out. None appears for the revision petitioner. 2. Order sheet discloses that the petitioner is consistently absent before this Court and suo motu this Court is adjourning the matter in the interest of justice. 3. In fact, this Court adjourned the matter on 14.10.2025 to 25.10.2025 as a last chance. 4. On 25.10.2025 also there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner and the matter was ordered to be listed to today. Today also there is no representation. 5. Petition is of the year 2016 wherein decree of the Trial Court for recovery of money is assailed. 6. Taking note of the fact that the petition is of the year 2016 and money decree is not satisfied, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65