Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8750 (UTT)

DHARAMVEER GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1190/2025 · 2025-07-11

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6020 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1190 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant–Dharamveer Gangwar S/o Sohan Lal is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 07.06.2025, bearing FIR No.0268 of 2025, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under punishable 8/21 of the NDPS Act. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is 133 gram of Smack, is a non-commercial quantity. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that there is no substantial compliance of Section 50, 52 and 57 of the NDPS Act and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. On the other side, Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State, on instruction, apprise to this Court that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is a non-commercial quantity and he has no previous criminal history, however, the investigation is going on. 7. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be 2025:UHC:6020 recovered from the present applicant, is a non-commercial quantity and the applicant has no previous criminal history, therefore, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant, namely, ‘Dharamveer Gangwar,’ be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail, the applicant shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation, failing which, the prosecution is directed to move an application for cancelling the bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 11.07.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:6020