Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8750 (PNJ)

KARAMBIR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/12864/2025 · 2026-09-02

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 227 Karambir State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of Certiorari order dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat Depot to Delhi Depot, in violation of the Policy (Annexure P particularly when the petitioner is due period of 12 months. the petitioner that the petitioner has retired after attaining the age of CWP-12864-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12864 of 2025 Date of decision : Karambir Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mohit Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for quashing and setting aside the impugned transfer office order dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), qua the peti respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat Depot to Delhi Depot, in violation of the Policy (Annexure P-2) and Amended Online Policy (Annexure P particularly when the petitioner is due to retire/superannuate within a period of 12 months. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has retired after attaining the age of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 12864 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mohit Rathee, Advocate Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of , for quashing and setting aside the impugned transfer office 1), qua the petitioner, passed by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat Depot to Delhi Depot, in violation of the Department Online 2) and Amended Online Policy (Annexure P-3), to retire/superannuate within a At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has retired after attaining the age of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.03 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document superannuation and as such the present writ petition has been rende infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable CWP-12864-2025 (O & M) superannuation and as such the present writ petition has been rende infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. September 02, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 superannuation and as such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.03 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document