SABRI SHIKSHAN PRASHIKSHAN SAMITI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1408/2021 · 2025-08-10
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8750 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8750 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:40337
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1408 of 2021 * - Sabri Shikshan Prashikshan Samiti (A Society Registered Under The Societies Registration Act) Village And Post Tusma, Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Through Director Purushottam Sahu S/o Shri Budhram Sahu, Aged About 32 Years, Village Tusma Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 – Collector, Civil And Revenue, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Janjgir , Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 6 - Naib Tahsildar Shivrinarayan , Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 7 - Gram Panchayat Kuriyari Through Secretary Gram Panchayat Kuriyari, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate For Respondents No. 1, 2, 4 & 6 For Respondent No. 7 : : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate. Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11/08/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.08.14 19:58:17 +0530
2 10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to decide the application of the petitioner Society (Annexure P-3) to grant the lease. 10.3 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the work of construction of Gaothan over the 3.5. acres of land out of Kh. No. 189/1K area 14.62 acres, of Village – Tendua, Tahsil – Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) till the application of the petitioner Society for grant of lease is decided. 10.4 Any other relief / reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed. 2. Mr.
Ramesh Nayak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the representation (Annexure P-3) made by the petitioner for grant of lease is still pending consideration before the respondent authorities. He would contend that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to decide the said representation. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respective respondents would oppose. 4. Considering the submission made by Mr. Ramesh Nayak, this petition, at this juncture, is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid direction(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti