- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43708 WP No. 2869 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 2869 OF 2016 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT DODDAMUNIYAMMA W/O LATE KADIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDENT OF THIRUMALASHETTYHALLI, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 560 067. 2. SMT. PAPAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAKADIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VENKATAGIRIKOTE A K COLONY, CHITAMANI TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT, PIN:560 123 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.S. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43708 WP No. 2869 of 2016 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, VISVESHWARAIAH TOWER, PODIUM BLOCK, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN:560 001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN: 560 067 5. SMT RUKKAMMA W/O ERAPPA, AGE MAJOR, 6. SRI ERAPPA S/O LATE VALLABHAIAH AGE MAJOR, RESPONDENTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF THIRUMALASHETTYHALLI, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 560 067 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4 SMT. R. SHOBHA S. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43708 WP No. 2869 of 2016 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 IN R.P.NO.83/2007-08 DATED 07.05.2011 VIDE ANNEX-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the parties. 2. This matter was listed on 30.10.2025. There was no representation for the petitioners or the respondents even on the second call on that day. Hence, the matter was listed today. Today also, there is no representation for the parties. In such circumstances, it could be presumed that neither the petitioners nor the respondents are interested to pursue this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7