RAJENDRA AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/28145/2025 · 2025-08-20
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143831 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28145 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Singh Yadav,Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issued a writ order a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 19.06.2025 passed by respondent number 2 in revision / case numer 1492/2025 computerized case number C202514000001492 under section 333 U.P.Z.A and L.R. Act gram Pradhan versus Shiv Dutta and others. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent number 2 expeditiously decide the revision number 1492/2025 computerized case number C202514000001492 under section 333 U.P.Z.A and L.R. Act gram Pradhan versus Shiv Dutta and others with in time bound as well as directed the authority concerned to execute the order dated 28.04.2025 passed by Upper Ziladhikari, Jakhaniya Ghazipur in case number 116/170/186/2013-2014 computerized case number-D201814290000226 under section 198(4) U.P.Z.A. state versus Shiv Dutta and not to dispossess the petitioner's from land in question during the pendency of writ petition before this Hon'ble court otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury."
2. It is contended that revision No. 1492 of 2025 is pending
consideration before the respondent No. 2. The prayer made in the writ petition is to expedite the aforesaid case.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide the revision No.1492 of 2025 [Computerized Case No. C-202514000001492], in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands
disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit.
Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad