APHC010095112024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO TH THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1285/2024 Between: M/s Symbiosys Technologies 2 Sri KVV Satyanarayana and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. C SUMON 2. HARINATH REDDY SOMA 3. K NARSI REDDY IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1285/2024 Symbiosys Technologies 2D AND Satyanarayana and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Contemnor(S): HARINATH REDDY SOMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) 2 The Court made the following Order: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.30138 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing both sides and taking into consideration the instructions produced by the learned Government Pleader, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to pay the admitted amount of Rs.1,05,07,598/- due to the petitioner within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate her claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents in an appropriate forum. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.30138 of 2023, dated 29.11.2023, have already been complied with by the respondents, and as such, requests to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 04.04.2025 MDP