Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8742 (JHR)

SHREE SHYAM INFOTECH THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHYAM ANURAG v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1656/2025 · 2025-04-08

Deepak Roshan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11269-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1656 of 2025 -------- Shree Shyam Infotech through its proprietor Shyam Anurag Age-49, S/o O.P Pranav, Situated at 1st Floor Sagar Kunj, Singhi Marg, P.P Compound, P.O & P.S- Doranda, Distt- Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Jharkhand Education Project Council through its Project Director JSCA Stadium Raod, Sector-3, Dhurwa PO & PS-Dhurwa-Ranchi- 834004. 3. Department of School Education & Literacy through its Secretary Office- MDI building, P.O & P.S- Dhurwa, Distt- Ranchi. 4. Gem Portal Government e Marketplace through its Director Office- 3rd, Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Building, Connaught Place, New Delhi, P.O & P.S- Connaught Place, Distt- New Delhi 5. Ministry of Commerce and Industries through its Secretary, Vanijya Bhawan P.O & P.S- Tilak Marg, Distt- New Delhi … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Prem Mardi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG For the Respondent-JEPC : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kr. Pathak, Advocate Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate -------- 02/Dated: 08.04.2025 M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J. (Oral) In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 01.07.2024 black-listing the petitioner. The said order is passed by the respondent no.2 after giving prior show-cause notice and asking the petitioner to show-cause why it should not be black-listed for non-supply of certain laptops even after four months of placing the supply order on the petitioner. The petitioner did not reply to the show-cause notice and consequently, it was black-listed by the impugned order. Since there is 2025:JHHC:11269-DB 2 no defence on the part of the petitioner as to why the petitioner ought not to be black-listed, we see no error in the decision taken by the respondent no.2 in black-listing the petitioner for two years. Therefore, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit/Kunal