IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 244 NAVDEEP SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. official respondents to register FIR No.101 dated 16.06.2024, under Sections 420, District Moga, because FIR No.19 dated 12.08.2024, under Sections 13(1), 13(2) of PC Act, 1988 and Sections and 120-B IPC cause of action. 2. filed by way of affidavit of the Supe Bureau), Moga, dated 12.12.2024, which read thus: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision NAVDEEP SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has sought issuance of directions to the official respondents to register FIR No.101 dated 16.06.2024, under 420, 465, 467, 471 and 120-B IPC, at Police St District Moga, because FIR No.19 dated 12.08.2024, under Sections (2) of PC Act, 1988 and Sections B IPC, Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Ferozepur, ha cause of action. Learned State counsel refers to para 3 to 6 of the short reply filed by way of affidavit of the Superintendent of Police (Vigilance Bureau), Moga, dated 12.12.2024, which read thus: “3. ….During enquiry, it is also found that said Dilkhush Kumri had gone to Cyprus on Domestic work visa on 13.03.2023. During enquiry, it is found in connivance with said Dilkhush Kumri and Harmnder Singh initially transferred the land measuring 52 Kanal 13 Marlas of State of Punjab in favour of Dilkhush Kumari on the basis of forged and fabricated mutation. As some portion of said land was acquired by for National Highway, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46771-2024 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.09.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. has sought issuance of directions to the official respondents to register FIR No.101 dated 16.06.2024, under B IPC, at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga, because FIR No.19 dated 12.08.2024, under Sections (2) of PC Act, 1988 and Sections 409, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Ferozepur, has the same Learned State counsel refers to para 3 to 6 of the short reply rintendent of Police (Vigilance Bureau), Moga, dated 12.12.2024, which read thus: ….During enquiry, it is also found that said Dilkhush Kumri had gone to Cyprus on Domestic work visa on 13.03.2023. During enquiry, it is found in Dilkhush Kumri and Harmnder Singh initially transferred the land measuring 52 Kanal 13 Marlas of State of Punjab in favour of Dilkhush Kumari on the basis of forged and fabricated mutation. As some portion of said land was acquired by for National Highway, and said PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-46771-2024 -2- Dilkhush Kumari obtained morethan Rs.1 Crore on account of compensation from Government Department. In this way they have committed the offences u/s 13(1)(A) read with section 13(2) PC Act 1988 and 409/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC. 4. That after completion of enquiry, the same was sent to approval by the enquiry officer. After approval of said enquiry by the higher authorities. Present case has been registered. 5. That as arrest of all the accused is still pending, so investigation of the case is going on. However, there is sufficient evidence on the file to connect the petitioner with the crime. 6. That it is further submitted here that regarding same occurrence on the basis of complaint moved by Additional Deputy Commissioner, Moga, case bearing FIR No.101 Dated 16.06.2024 U/s 420/465/467/471/120-B IPC PS Dharamkot has been registered against petitioner and Dilkhush Kumari. In said case petitioner was arrested by the police of PS Dharamkot and Corruption act has been further added. After completion of investigation challan has already been presented before the Ld. Court. In said case the prevention of Corruption Act is added. So, an application has been moved by the answering respondent through higher authorities to the Director Bureau of Investigation, Punjab to transfer the investigation of said case to the vigilance department.” 3. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed and, as such, the present petition stands disposed of. 10.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.