Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87407 (PNJ)

MAJEED AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22267/2025 · 2025-08-06

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.135 Majeed and others State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Anil Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.7. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.7-Gram Panchayat, Baikhera (Mewat) to take a decisi submitted by the petitioner 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice counsel appearing for respondent No.7 accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the representation by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Anil Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.7. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Gram Panchayat, Baikhera-Behripur, Block Ferozepur Jhirka, District Nuh to take a decision on the representation date the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice counsel appearing for respondent No.7, have no objection if the above prayer is Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. representation dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P- g a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22267-2025 Date of decision : 06.08.2025 .…. Petitioners ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.7. submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Behripur, Block Ferozepur Jhirka, District Nuh dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-9), Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice and learned no objection if the above prayer is Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.7 to take a decision -9), submitted by the petitioners, g a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the PRINCE SAINI 2025.08.07 22:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22267-2025 petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 5. Till the final decision is taken by respondent No.7 on the petitioners’ representation dated 15.06.2025 (Annexur possession over the disputed land shall be maintained. 06.08.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Till the final decision is taken by respondent No.7 on the petitioners’ representation dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-9), possession over the disputed land shall be maintained. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No : Yes / No [ 2 ] and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Till the final decision is taken by respondent No.7 on the petitioners’ 9), status quo with regard to the possession over the disputed land shall be maintained. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.08.07 22:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document