1 19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 19 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 635 OF 2023 Sattar Khan S/o. Mansur Khan. … Applicant Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. Shaikh Wasim S/o Shaikh Sardar. … Respondents ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Vaibhav B. Kulkarni. APP for Respondent / State : Mr. P. S. Patil. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. R. Bagal. (Appointed) ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 06th August, 2025. P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2 After disinclination is shown to grant any relief to the applicant, upon instructions, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. 3 Leave granted. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4 The fees of Mr. S. R. Bagal, learned appointed counsel for respondent No.2 is quantified at Rs.7,000/- and it is to be paid through the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ] nga 2025:BHC-AUG:20902-DB