Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87388 (PAT)

Laljeet Ram v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89573/2024 · 2025-01-08

Khatim Reza

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89573 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2024 Thana- PAUTHU District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Laljeet Ram S/O Late Ramkrit Ram Resident of Village- Achuki, P.S- Pauthu, Distt.- Aurangabad. 2. Ajit Ram S/O Late Ramkrit Ram Resident of Village- Achuki, P.S- Pauthu, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 2 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024 dated 06.08.2024, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 329(3), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the date of occurrence the accused persons including the petitioners in inebriated condition came at the door of the informant with danda and gadasi in their hands and assaulted the informant and his nephew Jethan Singh leading to head injuries. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89573 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/3 petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners rather the allegation is general and omnibus. It is submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. The counter case has been lodged by co- accused Ranjit Ram bearing Pauthu P.S. Case No. 79 of 2024 under Section 126(2) and other allied sections of B.N.S. It is also submitted that in the counter case Ranjit Ram and his wife Ranju Devi have received injuries and were taken to Sadar hospital for treatment. It is also submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. Lastly, it has been submitted that they have no criminal antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024, they shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, subject to condition as laid down Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89573 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.. prabhat/- (Khatim Reza, J) U T