-1- VATAP-95-2013 105 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH VATAP-95-2013 (O&M) Decided on:09.09.2025 Ganpati Golden Transport Co. .... Appellant versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana. **** Lisa Gill, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this appeal is for setting aside order dated 22.01.2013 (Annexure A-9) passed by learned Haryana Tax Tribunal, Chandigarh. 2. Perusal of the file reveals that this appeal was admitted on 19.05.2014 and directed to be listed for final hearing on 03.09.2014. Perusal of the file further reveals that thereafter none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Notice was firstly issued to learned counsel for appellant vide order dated 06.01.2023. Subsequently, notice was directed to be issued to appellant as well vide order dated 30.07.2024 when learned counsel for the appellant had not appeared. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that Sh. Som Nath, Proprietor of Ganpati Golden Transport Company was not available in firm and none was ready to accept the notice on his behalf. SONIA BURA 2025.09.15 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- VATAP-95-2013 3. In the given factual matrix, it appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in default and for non-prosecution. Copy of this order be conveyed to the appellant at the given address. (LISA GILL) JUDGE 09.09.2025 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No SONIA BURA 2025.09.15 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document