Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87374 (PNJ)

BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/26673/2021 · 2025-03-24

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 231 Bahadur Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to pay a sum of Rs.3,06,622/ the gratuity of the petitioner, alongwith interest. 2. case, the amount that was recovered from the DCRG has been paid back, however, with regard to the interest, the petitioner would submit a representation, which may be directed to be decided, in a manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case, the petitioner submits within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided accordance with law. 24.03.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bahadur Singh Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.3,06,622/- which had been deducted from the gratuity of the petitioner, alongwith interest. Learned counsel submits that during pendency of the present case, the amount that was recovered from the DCRG has been paid back, however, with regard to the interest, the petitioner would submit a representation, which may be directed to be decided, in a manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case, the petitioner submits within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26673-2021 (O & M) Date of decision: 24.03.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Advocate, for the petitioner. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the which had been deducted from the gratuity of the petitioner, alongwith interest. Learned counsel submits that during pendency of the present case, the amount that was recovered from the DCRG has been paid back, however, with regard to the interest, the petitioner would submit a representation, which may be directed to be decided, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case, the petitioner submits the representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.25 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.