SHOAIB KHAN v. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE
WP/25395/2025 · 2025-09-11
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87366 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87366 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36026 WP No. 25395 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 25395 OF 2025 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN:
SHOAIB KHAN S/O ASADULLA KHAN, AGED 23 YEARS, EXAM REG. NO. 21H0509 R/AT DOOR NO. 62, 4TH CROSS, TELECOM LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DIVYATEJ H.N, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR
/ REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) 4TH BLOCK EAST, PATTABHINAGAR, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560 041.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL BHAGAVAN BUDDHA HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, NO. 103/6, 40 FEET ROAD,
NGEF LAYOUT, MALLATHALLI, BENGALURU - 560056.
3.
CENTRAL COUNCIL OF HOMOEOPATHY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JANAKPURI NEW DELHI - 110 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1)
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36026 WP No. 25395 of 2025
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO RELEASE THE III BHMS EXAMINATION ADMISSION TICKETS OF THE PETITIONER AND ALLOW HIM TO WRITE THE EXAMINATION WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO COMMENCE FROM 21.08.2025 AS PER EXAMINATION NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 UNIVERSITY TIME TABLE FOR IIIRD PROFESSIONAL BHMS EXAMINATION OF AUGUST /SEPTEMBER 2025 AND THEREBY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 UNIVERSITY ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS OF THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner have filed a Memo dated 11.09.2025 stating that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE BMC/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68