HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28512 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ishan Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Tejasvi Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents has raised objection and submitted that apart from the fact that proceedings referred have already been concluded in the year 1987, therefore, petitioner is having no locus to challenge the same in the light of settled provisions of law. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the present writ petition and submits that petition may be dismissed with liberty to approach the Competent Authority for mutation of their name. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 5. So far as liberty is concerned, it is always open for the petitioners to approach Competent Authority for redressal of his grievance and for that no liberty is required from the Court. October 6, 2025 A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Poonam Yadav, Raj Karan Yadav, Yadvendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Pandey, Tejasvi Misra (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Roobi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad