Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8734 (AP)

RAO SURESH, v. Sri G.Anantha Ramu, I.A.S,

CC/1393/2024 · 2025-07-16

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010094892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1393/2024 Between: 1. RAO SURESH, S/O. HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC FARMER R/O. DOOR NO. 16-144, S.B.I NAGAR, CHINTALAPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI NOW ELURU DISTRICT, A.P.- 534460 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G ANANTHA RAMU I.A.S, S/O. NOT KNOWN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I.A.S, S/O. NOT KNOWN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 3. SRI P ARJUNA RAO I A S DISCHARGED, S/O. NOT KNOWN THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR BC WELFARE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA AP R3 IS DISCHARGED FROM THIS CONTEMPT CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 25 11 2024 VIDE IA NO 1 OF 2024 IN CC NO 1393 OF 2024 4. SRI V PRASANNA VENKATESH I A S, S/O. NOT KNOWN DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, A.P. 5. SMT K KHUSHBU DISCHARGED, W D O NOT KNOWN DISTRICT B C WELFARE OFFICER BC WELFARE OFFICE ASHOK NAGAR ELURU AP R5 IS DISCHARGED FROM THIS CONTEMPT CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 23 12 2024 IN VIDE I A NO 3 OF 2024 CC NO 1393 OF 2024 6. SRI G ANANTHA RAMU I A S, S/O. NOT KNOWN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EWS WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 7. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 03 02 2025 VIDE I A NO 2 OF 2024 IN CC NO 1393 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 5 for their wilful disobedience of order Dt. 23.09.2023 passed in W.P No. 20567 of 2023 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner herein/respondent no.3 in the above contempt case on all further dates and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No.7 in the contempt case No. 1393 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the 5th respondent name in the above contempt case and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with my further personal appearance in Contempt Case No. 1393 of 2024 in W.P.No. 20567 of 2023 may be pleased to pass. IA NO: 5 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to recall the Bailable warrant issued against the respondent No.5 on 25-11-2024 in CC.No.1393 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the presence of Respondent No.7 on 04.03.2025 as directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 03.02.2025, from the instant case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PEDDI VIJAYBHASKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. K M KRISHNA REDDY 4. Y SUDHAKAR The Court made the following order: In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that, the orders disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS