Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:27234 Con.Case(C).No.2809/24 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2809 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.34988 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS: 1 P.KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN NAIR, RESIDING AT RAM NIVAS, THADAPARAMBA, PO. NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673
016. 2 SUJITH RAM PARAYIL, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, RESIDING AT RAM NIVAS, THADAPARAMBA, PO. NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673
016.
BY ADVS. V.V.SURENDRAN P.A.HARISH SANIKA.V.S.
DONA PAUL DIVIN V.VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS: 1 HARSHIL R MEENA, AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
2025:KER:27234 Con.Case(C).No.2809/24 2 KOZHIKODE, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PO. CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673
020. 2 HIMA K, AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR), KOZHIKODE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR), PO. CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673 020.
Smt.Amminikutty.K, Sr.GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:27234 Con.Case(C).No.2809/24 3
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for consideration on 13.03.2025 the following order was passed.
“Today, when the matter came up for
consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the sketch showing the earmarking of 10% of the property for water conservancy measures was produced before the respondent on 21.02.2025. The learned Government Pleader shall get instructions.
Post on 28.03.2025.” Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader upon instruction submitted that, the petitioner submitted a sketch showing the earmarking of 10% of the property for water conservancy measures. Thereupon the application was processed and for that a demand notice for conversion fee was already issued to the petitioner. On payment of the said amount further proceedings shall be initiated. This submission is recorded. In such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed, giving opportunity to the petitioner to approach this
2025:KER:27234 Con.Case(C).No.2809/24 4 Court to reopen the contempt of court case again, if the proceedings are not finalized as referred to above. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE DG/29.3.25
2025:KER:27234 Con.Case(C).No.2809/24 5 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2809/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 19.11.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER UNDER FORM 7 OF THE RULES FRAMED UNDER THE KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT Annexure A2 . A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER DATED 08.12.2022 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05.09.2023 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR Annexure A4 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN W.P. (C) 34988/2023 DATED 14.02.2024 Annexure A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DATED 04.03.2024