Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87324 (KAR)

SRI.H.SIDDHAPPA @ H.SIDDHESHAPPA v. SRI.VISHWAJEETH MEHTHA

CCC/1202/2024 · 2025-08-20

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32513-DB CCC No. 1202 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1202 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. H. SIDDHAPPA @ H. SIDDHESHAPPA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST GUDDADHA BEERANAHALLI VILLAGE LAKKAVALLI HOBLI, TARIKERE TQ, CHIKMAGALURU DIST. - 577228. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. H. MALATESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VISHWAJEETH MEHTHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TQ, Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32513-DB CCC No. 1202 of 2024 CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT- 577 228 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP/ BY PRL. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT, M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR BEEDI BENGALURU - 01 …ACCUSED (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS TO HOLD THE OFFENCE OF CONTEMPT PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 AND PUNISH HIM AS PER LAW, FOR NOT COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED 12.07.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WP No.18431/2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32513-DB CCC No. 1202 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the accused that the directions issued by the learned Single Judge was to consider the representations and to pass appropriate orders. It is submitted that endorsements have been rendered in the above matter and copy of the endorsement has been served to the learned counsel appearing for the complainant. 2. Leaving open the contentions of the complainant and reserving liberty to challenge the endorsements, if aggrieved, the contempt of Court Case is dropped. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61