- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40227 WP No. 23755 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.23755 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S AALA VENTURES LTD HAVIN ITS HEAD OFFICE AT NO 403, 3RD FLOOR 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK HBR LAYOUT KALYAN NAGAR P O BENGALURU - 560043 REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAJMU HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIVASTHAVA H.K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE COMPTENT AUTHORITY FOR AAALA VENTURES LTD …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40227 WP No. 23755 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21/10/2022 IN MISC NO.1088/2022, PASSED BY THE XCI ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASE, BENGALURU (CCH-92), WHEREBY THE PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY HEREIN UNDER SECTION 5(2) OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004 CAME TO BE ALLOWED.II) QUASHING THE INTERIM ORDER OF ATTACHMENT PASSED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. RD-28-GRC-2019 BENGALURU DATED 18.11.2019. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is listed for 5th time for non- compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.03.2025, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40227 WP No. 23755 of 2023 this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks time to rectify the said objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17