Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87319 (ALL)

BALRAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 30 OTHERS

WRIC/31311/2025 · 2025-09-09

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31311 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondent District Collector/Additional District Collector (J) to consider and finally decide Case No. 805/2021, Computerized No. D202103400000805, (Pinki Devi Vs Rambabu and others), Under Section 128 UP Revenue Code, expeditiously, within a specified time frame." 2. It is contended that proceedings under Section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the respondent No. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to expedite the aforesaid case. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 805 of 2021, Computerized Case No. D-202103400000805, (Pinki Devi Vs Rambabu and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 10, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav, Yashpal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Balram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 30 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad