JITENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1314/2025 · 2025-02-14
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21306-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1314 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Nand Singh,Priti Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 11.11.2024 registered as Case Crime no.856/2024, under sections 85, 80(2) BNS and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the order dated 07.02.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.1195 of 2025 (Sita Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and others), wherein learned A.G.A.-I apprised to the Court that the investigation has already been completed and chargesheet has been submitted against husband of the deceased, namely Mahendra Kumar Gautam and qua other co-accused Final Report has been submitted. In this backdrop, he states that petitioners do not wish to press the writ petition and accordingly, the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances, no further direction is required in the matter.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad