HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1300 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist has stated at the Bar that final judgement in the pending trial has been passed and the revisionist has been convicted in the said case crime, hence the present revision has become infructuous. 3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the revisionist, this revision is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Subject to the observations made above, this revision is consigned to record. October 9, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Balbir Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhishek Mayank, G.A. (Harvir Singh,J.) Abid .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad