CRWP-8388 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Gurpreet Kaur and another State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 and 3 interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No. relatives. 2. are major and have mar apprehend danger from respondent nos. photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P 31.07.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. respondent-State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a -2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurpreet Kaur and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Gagandeep Kumar Tiwari, Advocate, for Mr. Vinay Kumar Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos. apprehend danger from respondent nos.6 to 9 photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a represe .07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent nos Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to eval value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8388-2025 Decided on:04.08.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Gagandeep Kumar Tiwari, Advocate, for Mr. Vinay Kumar Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioners. have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.6 to 9 and their Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners ried against the wishes of respondent nos.6 to 9. They 6 to 9. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated s.2 and 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. , accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a ...Petitioners ...Respondents have filed the present petition under Articles of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to and their Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They . Their marriage certificate and 3 and ntation dated , accepts notice on behalf of the uate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.06 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8388 direction to respondent no Tarn Taran and Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala representation (Annexure P any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. August 04, 2025 vinod* -2025 direction to respondent nos.2 and 3- Senior Tarn Taran and Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala ntation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, District Tarn Taran and Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala to decide the 5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Superintendent of Police, District to decide the 5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.06 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document