Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87285 (KAR)

SMT T CHANDRAKALA v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/22735/2022 · 2025-12-18

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54182 WP No. 22735 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 22735 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT T CHANDRAKALA W/O Y. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.24, 2ND B CROSS HOSAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HUBLI SHRISHAIL AYYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD ADMN. OFF 3, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU - 560 018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K V LOKEAH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54182 WP No. 22735 of 2022 THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DATED 12.10.2022 NO.BCCB/AO/SARFAESIA /139/2022-23 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsels appearing for the respective parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the Sale Notice dated 12.10.2022 (Annexure-E). Learned counsel representing the respondents submitted that, the sale has not been taken place pursuant to the issuance of Annexure-E and that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17