Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142581 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30468 of 2025 Applicant :- Sachin Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kishor Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Shri Raj Kishor Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Radhey Shyam, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the concerned police in 7 cases. It has further been submitted that in all the cases bail application has been allowed by this Court/ court below but due to his poverty and financial crisis he is not able to manage separate sureties in all the cases. It has further been submitted that the applicant may be allowed to be released on bail only on two sureties in regard to all the cases. 3. Learned counsel further submitted that the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the following cases: 1. Case Crime No. 598 of 2011 Under sections 302, 120B I.P.C. Police Station Saraikhwaja, District Jaunpur. 2. Case Crime No. 155 of 2012, Under sections 392 LP.C., Police Station Sarpatahan, District Jaunpur. 3. Case Crime No. 372 of 2012 Under section 302, 120B, 109 IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Line Bazar, District Jaunpur. 4. Case Crime No. 287 of 2012, Under sections 394, 411, 120-B LP.C. Police Station Saraikhwaja, District Jaunpur. 5. Case Crime no. 341 of 2012 Under section 307 I.P.C. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Saraikhwaja, District Jaunpur. 6. Case crime no. 394 of 2012 Under section 307 I.P.C. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Saraikhwaja, District Jaunpur. 7. Case crime no. 395 of 2012 Under section 3, 25,27 of Arms Act, Police Station Saraikhwaja, District Jaunpur. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed and submitted that all the offences against the applicant are pending in different courts and hence prayer of the applicant cannot be allowed. 5. Keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the factual argument and the judgment and order dated 29.10.2018 of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh passed in Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8914-8915/2018, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met in case applicant is directed to submit fresh two sureties and a personal bond to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in one case and the same shall be considered by the Court concerned as sureties and bonds in other case(s) for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail. 6. It is ordered accordingly. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application U/s 528 BNSS is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 RKM Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad