Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143911 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6740 of 2025 Applicant :- Brijlal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Noor Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 122 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Sarai Mamrej, District Prayagraj. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the applicant along with five named accused is alleged to have assaulted Santosh Kumar and Arvind Kumar. No medical report with regard to Santosh Kumar is available in the case diary. As per the medical report of Arvind Kumar, he received two injuries. The said injuries were found simple in nature. It is contended that the nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder. Identically placed co-accused Suraj @ Sagar Gautam has been granted anticipatory bail, till submission of police report, by this court vide order dated 06.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 6051 of 2025. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that as per the medical report of Arvind Kumar, he received two injuries, which were found simple in nature; the nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder; identically placed co-accused Suraj @ Sagar Gautam has been granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report by this court; at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Akash @ Vishal be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Lbm/- Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad