Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87259 (PNJ)

LAL SINGH v. DEEPAK PARBHAKER PATIL, IFS

COCP/3868/2025 · 2025-08-05

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 103 Lal Singh Sh. Deepak Parbhaker Patil, Territorial, Rewari. CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated of this Court in CWP Haryana and others”, vide which the writ petition was disposed of with a direction Rewari, Forest Division, Rewari, to decide the representation dated 01.07.2024 (Annexure P 30.07.2024 and 02.09.2024 (Annexures P petitioner accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of COCP-3868-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3868 of 2025 Date of decision : Lal Singh Versus Sh. Deepak Parbhaker Patil, IFS, Deputy Conservator of Forest Territorial, Rewari. CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-5556-2025 titled as “ Haryana and others”, vide which the writ petition was disposed of with a direction “…..to respondent No.3 Rewari, Forest Division, Rewari, to decide the representation dated 01.07.2024 (Annexure P-4) followed by subsequent reminders dated 30.07.2024 and 02.09.2024 (Annexures P petitioner and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3868 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-05.08.2025 …..Petitioner IFS, Deputy Conservator of Forest …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate (through VC) Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Lal Singh vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the writ petition was disposed of to respondent No.3-Divisional Forest Officer, Rewari, Forest Division, Rewari, to decide the representation dated 4) followed by subsequent reminders dated 30.07.2024 and 02.09.2024 (Annexures P-5 and P-6) submitted by the and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document receipt of certified copy of this order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if prescribed under law. undertakes that the Speaking Order shall be passed on the representations of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present petition may be disposed of. passed in the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the present contempt petition August 05 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3868-2025 (O & M) receipt of certified copy of this order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if prescribed under law. Learned counsel for the respondent undertakes that the Speaking Order shall be passed on the representations of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of atement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present petition may be disposed of. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is However, in case the needful is n undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the present contempt petition Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 5, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 receipt of certified copy of this order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if prescribed under law.” ed counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions, undertakes that the Speaking Order shall be passed on the representations of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of atement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present In view of the above, no further orders are required to be present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. However, in case the needful is not done as per the above undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document