Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26367 CRL.P No. 10604 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10604 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1. CHANDRAPPA S/O YALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
2.
A ABHILASH S/O ANANDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 'B' HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT
3. MANJUNATH S/O SAMPANGI AGED 35 YEARS R/O CHIKKATHIMMASANDRA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
4. SAKAMMA W/O NEERAGANTI CHINNAGE AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O CHIKKATHIMMASANDRA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26367 CRL.P No. 10604 of 2023
5. SRIKANTH S/O CHIKKAYALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 'B' HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JEEVAN K, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SARJAPURA P.S SARJAPURA - 562125 REPRESENTED BY HCGP HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BENGALURU - 560 001
2. CHANDRAREDDY S/O LATE EERANNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT 'B' HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT POLICE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B ON THE FILE OF PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C ANEKAL IN C.C.NO.1790/2018 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 465,471,420,120(B) OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26367 CRL.P No. 10604 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER
Vide order dated 01.07.2025, a peremptory order was passed by granting two weeks' time to comply with the office objections. Despite the same, the office objections have not been complied with. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
2. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate
order is required.
Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE
ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8