Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87231 (PNJ)

PRITPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/22368/2025 · 2025-08-04

Jagmohan Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22368-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 125 CWP-22368-2025 Date of Decision: 04.08.2025 Pritpal Singh ...Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders dated 03.04.2025 and 18.12.2024 whereby petitioner was dismissed from service. 2. On being confronted with Rule 16.32 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (in short ‘PPR’), learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert the fact that revision is maintainable before DGP against appellate order of DIG. He points out that in the impugned order, DIG has mentioned that appeal is maintainable before the DGP. 3. It is hereby clarified that under Rule 16.32 of PPR against appellate order revision is maintainable and not appeal. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.06 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-22368-2025 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file revision before DGP. 5. Disposed of with aforesaid liberty. 6. It is made clear that if the revision is filed within 15 days from today, the same would be entertained without raising question of limitation. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 04.08.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.06 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.