1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 718 of 2020 1 - Smt. Seema Tayal W/o Shri Sunil Tayal Aged About 48 Years R/o B-65, Vip Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P. S. Khamardih, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Manju Pathak W/o Shri P. K. Pathak Aged About 49 Years R/o B-64, Vip Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P. S. Khamardih, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Kavita Goyal W/o Shri Vikas Goyal Aged About 42 Years R/o B-67, Vip Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P. S. Khamardih, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Town And Country Planning, Indirawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, New Composite Building, Second Floor, Collector Parisar, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Regularization Committee Through The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Municipal Corporation Raipur Through The Commissioner, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Pramila Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Through The President, Shankar Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Smt. Richa Devi Jadhavani R/o B-59 And B-60, Savitri Devi Complex, Vip Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P. S. Khamardih, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents REKHA SINGH -2- For Petitioners : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Advocate holding the brief Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr.Raj Kumar Gupta, Additional A.G. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Manas Vajpayee, Advocate along with Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For respondent 7 : Mr. Kabir Kalwani, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25.07.2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, to call for the entire records pertaining to the petitioner's case for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside impugned order dated 13.08.2019 passed by respondent no. 4 (ANNEXURE P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondents for using plot no. B-59 and B-60 of respondent no. 7, for residential use only and stop all commercial activity with immediate effect and demolish the illegal part of construction made upon plot no. B-59 & B-60 of respondent no. 7, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as if may deem fit and appropriate. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be given.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, would submit that respondent No.7 has raised construction in violation of sanctioned map at Khamardih, Raipur. 3. On the other hand, learned counsels appearing for the respondents would oppose the submissions made by Mr. Sahu. They would submit that an application for regularization of illegal construction was moved before the respondent authorities and it has already been regularized 3 and certificate has been issued by the District Regularization Committee, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Zila Raipur on 08.12.2023 and the petitioners have not challenged said order. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on the record. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the order of regularization has already been passed in favour of respondent No.7 and the certificate has been issued by the competent authority on 08.12.2023, thus, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if new cause of action arises in near future. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha